It’s not a matter of fashion: How psychological research can revamp common beliefs on lesbian and gay parenting
If we look at the basis of the studies summarised above, it is evident that most psychological research, in true good faith and probably unconsciously, has adopted some assumptions that could reinforce the idea of lesbian and gay parenting as something abnormal. First of all, the comparison between lesbian and gay parenting and heterosexual parenting is, in itself, something to reconsider since it creates two categories on the basis of sexual orientation, assuming that they are internally homogenous. If the readers think of four or five couples they know that are parents, they can easily remember differences and similarities between them (in their conjugal functioning, their parenting styles, etc.), whether they are lesbian, gay or heterosexual. Living in a lesbian or gay family is clearly ‘different’, but it is not because of some essential characteristics, rather in the sense that lesbian or gay families have been considered as abnormal through a range of legal, moral and social measures (Hicks, 2005). Moreover, when psychological research looks at dimensions such as sexual identity, inevitably it supports the idea that there is only one way of being “normal”: the straight self-identification, the straight gender role and the straight sexual orientation. Instead of reinforcing standard notions of gender and sexuality, a more critical research enquiry would help us to understand how all of us are required to perform the appropriate masculine or feminine roles differently dependent upon the context, and what the consequences are for those who challenge the social expectations about gender and sexuality (Hicks, 2013). Finally, scholars should also reflect on the possibility for their research to reach the public opinion, giving solid references for interpreting relevant social phenomena: why is the idea that children need a mum and a dad so hard to overcome and why does the resistance to accept lesbian and gay parents persist? Why, in spite of almost 40 years of research, do opinions on lesbian and gay parenting without any scientific basis get to be on the cover of a magazine? Why has psychological research not yet been able to succeed in contending that lesbian and gay parenting is not a fad? How can psychological research improve its social relevance so as to confront, with its empirical findings, those stereotypes that persist even among openly gay cosmopolitan people?
Thus, the contemporary challenge for research on lesbian and gay parenting is not to do more studies on the topics mentioned above, but instead to do studies that do not imply an artificial antithesis between same-sex and opposite-sex parents, and to find new ways to communicate their results.
References
Allen, M., & Burrell, N. (1996). Comparing the impact of homosexual and heterosexual parents on children: Meta-analysis of existing research. Journal of Homosexuality, 32, 19–35.
Anderssen, N., Amlie, C., & Ytterøy, E. A. (2002). Outcomes for children with lesbian or gay parents: A review of studies from 1978 to 2000. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 335-351.
Bailey, J. M., Bobrow, D., Wolfe, M., & Mikach, S. (1995). Sexual orientation of adult sons of gay fathers. Developmental Psychology, 31, 124-129.
Boldizar, J. P. (1991). Assessing sex typing and androgyny in children: The Children's Sex Role Inventory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 505-515.
Bos, H. M. W., Gartrell, K., van Balen, F., Peyser, H., & Sandfort, Th. G. M. (2008). Children in planned lesbian families: A cross-cultural comparison between the USA and the Netherlands. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78 , 211–219.
Bos, H. M. W., & van Balen, F. (2008). Children in Planned Lesbian Families: Stigmatisation, Psychological Adjustment and Protective Factors. Culture, Health, and Sexualities, 10, 221–236.
Bos, H., & Sandfort, T. G. M. (2010). Children’s gender identity in lesbian and heterosexual two-parent families. Sex Roles, 62, 114–126.
Brewaeys, A., Ponjaert, I., Van Hall, E. V., & Golombok, S. (1997). Donor insemination: Child development and family functioning in lesbian mother families. Human Reproduction, 12, 1349-1359.
Chan, R. W., Raboy, B., & Patterson, C. J. (1998). Psychosocial adjustment among children conceived via donor insemination by lesbian and heterosexual mothers. Child Development, 69, 443-457.
Clarke,V., Kitzinger, C., & Potter, J. (2004). <<Kids are just cruel anyway>>: Lesbian and gay parents’ talk about homophobic bullying. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 531-550.
Crowl, A., Ahn, S., & Baker, J. (2008). A meta-analysis of developmental outcomes for children of same-sex and heterosexual parents. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 4, 385–407.
Erich, S., Leung, P., & Kindle, P. (2005). A comparative analysis of adoptive family functioning with gay, lesbian and heterosexual parents and their children. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 1, 43-60.
Fedewa, A.L., Black, W.W., & Ahn, S. (2015). Children and Adolescents With Same-Gender Parents: A Meta-Analytic Approach in Assessing Outcomes, Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 11:1, 1-34.
Fitzgerald, B. (1999). Children of Lesbian and Gay Parents. Marriage & Family Review, 29:1, 57-75.
Flaks, D., Ficher, I., Masterpasqua, F., & Joseph, G. (1995). Lesbians choosing motherhood: A comparative study of lesbian and heterosexual parents and their children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 104-114.
Fulcher, M., Sutfin, E. L., & Patterson, C. J. (2008). Individual differences in gender development: Associations with parental sexual orientation, attitudes, and division of labor. Sex Roles, 58, 330–341.
